Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 03:09

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Vel expedita omnis impedit modi earum itaque ut.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
NASA’s CODEX Captures Unique Views of Sun’s Outer Atmosphere - NASA Science (.gov)
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Retinal prosthesis woven from tellurium nanowires partially restores vision in blind mice - Phys.org
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What are the main issues that have historically and currently divided Republicans and Democrats?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Prelim Results | UFC Fight Night: Blanchfield vs Barber - UFC.com
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?